2BRO started as a frustration and became a mission — to make serious robotics education accessible to anyone genuinely curious about how machines are learning to inhabit our world.
University courses teach five-year-old material. Research papers assume you hold a PhD. News articles go wide without depth. We built 2BRO because that resource didn't exist.
Every week, millions of people read about Boston Dynamics, Tesla's Optimus, or surgical robots in the operating room. Almost none come away understanding how any of it actually works. That gap is what 2BRO closes.
We write for people who want the real picture — not a dumbed-down sketch, but not an impenetrable technical manual either. Every piece is built to meet you at your level and take you somewhere further than you started.
We don't take sponsored placements, don't write to please manufacturers, and don't soft-pedal the hard questions about where robotics is headed. Independent analysis from people who read the primary literature.
"The machines are getting extraordinarily capable. The explanations available to the public have not kept pace. That asymmetry has consequences."
— 2BRO Editorial, January 2024After spending months trying to find a single resource that explained modern robotic systems accurately and accessibly — and finding nothing that fit the bill — the idea for 2BRO takes shape in a notebook.
The first ten pieces go live. The response is immediate — thousands of readers in the first month, most of them saying variants of the same thing: "This is exactly what I was looking for." Editorial direction confirmed.
The content library grows to 40+ articles across six topic areas. A structured learning path system launches. The newsletter crosses 12,000 subscribers. The approach — rigorous, accessible, unsponsored — defines a niche.
A complete redesign and restructuring. New topic areas covering the convergence of large language models with physical robotics. Deeper coverage of humanoid systems. The same commitment to explaining the field as it actually is.
We read primary sources. We don't simplify to the point of falsehood. When something is contested, we say so.
We don't accept sponsored content, paid placements, or affiliate arrangements. Our incentive is accuracy, not revenue.
We don't dumb things down. We find ways to explain hard concepts clearly — which is a different thing entirely.
The field moves fast. We update articles when the state of the art changes. Publication date is not a reason to let accuracy decay.